ideas: micro-SaaS shortlist (COI flagship, STR permits, DMARC watchdog)
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9b534415b
commit
d069f3a383
3 changed files with 140 additions and 0 deletions
62
ideas/micro-saas-shortlist.md
Normal file
62
ideas/micro-saas-shortlist.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|||
# Micro-SaaS ideas — "stupid simple deadline tools" shortlist
|
||||
|
||||
Researched 2026-09-16. Pattern: **a calendar with teeth** — tool X has no native
|
||||
expiry/deadline feature + an auditor/law requires it + incumbents are enterprise-
|
||||
priced → tiny flat-rate SaaS. Buyers are compliance-driven (dates + fines), not
|
||||
taste-driven — which suits us (no sales channel, but SEO + community distribution).
|
||||
|
||||
De-risk protocol per idea: landing page + one community post → measure email
|
||||
signups for a week → build only if ~30-50 signups. Infra spins landing pages up
|
||||
in an hour. Billing: Paddle/Stripe (user account, pending).
|
||||
|
||||
## Ranked shortlist
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. COI (certificate of insurance) / vendor compliance tracking — FLAGSHIP
|
||||
- Who pays: small general contractors, property managers, agencies.
|
||||
- Evidence: manual COI tracking costs ~$36,400/yr in labor
|
||||
(https://www.bramble.solutions/learn/coi-tracking-software/); enterprise tools
|
||||
$500+/mo "prohibitively expensive" for small contractors
|
||||
(https://trackmyvendor.com/compare-coi-tracking-software); new self-serve
|
||||
entrants price per-vendor $0.95-$20/mo (https://www.getbcs.com/pricing-and-plans)
|
||||
→ validated demand, SMB gap still open but entrants arriving — wedge is
|
||||
FLAT price ($25-30/mo unlimited vendors) + simplicity.
|
||||
- v1: vendors + policy uploads + expiry reminders (email/SMS) + audit log.
|
||||
Days of build. SEO keywords: "coi tracking for small contractors".
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. STR / rental permit & license deadline tracking
|
||||
- Who pays: short-term-rental hosts, small landlords.
|
||||
- Moat: per-city permit renewal rules (fragmented data nobody maintains well).
|
||||
- Hosts already pay for tools. Fines for missed renewals are real.
|
||||
- 1-2 weeks build (data collection is the work).
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. DMARC/SPF/DNS watchdog for SMB domains — WARM-UP (shippable this week)
|
||||
- Who pays: any small business burned by email deliverability breaking.
|
||||
- $5-10/mo. Very fast build; becomes lead-gen for the rest.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Equipment inspection logging (fire extinguishers, backflow, AED)
|
||||
- Small facility managers, churches, schools. Paper logbooks today,
|
||||
fire-marshal fines. 1 week build.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Employee cert / CE expiry tracking (small clinics, trades)
|
||||
- Office managers; HR platforms are enterprise. 1 week build.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Access-review evidence generator (user's original postgres idea, generalized)
|
||||
- Postgres + GitHub + AWS → quarterly access-review PDF for pre-SOC2 startups
|
||||
(10-50 people; spreadsheets until ~50 per
|
||||
https://www.accessowl.com/blog/detailed-guide-to-soc-2-access-reviews).
|
||||
- Risk: security buyers demand brand trust; integrations = scope creep. Rank last.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why these beat our failed attempts
|
||||
Compliance pain is a date with a fine attached (deadline-based), not a taste call
|
||||
(taste-based sells failed twice: ad-tech tools, site audits to cost-averse
|
||||
publishers).
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation status
|
||||
| # | landing page | signups | build |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | not started | — | — |
|
||||
| 2 | not started | — | — |
|
||||
| 3 | not started | — | can ship immediately |
|
||||
|
||||
Needs to proceed: product domain(s) (~$10 each, registrar-side), Paddle/Stripe
|
||||
(user).
|
||||
41
sales/network-owner-pitch.md
Normal file
41
sales/network-owner-pitch.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|||
# Network owner pitch — draft for [YOUR COMPANY NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
> Audience: the network owners you already interface with on the MA side.
|
||||
> One owner = many publisher sites. No per-publisher selling needed.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Subject: Free rebuilds for your network's sites — you keep the uplift**
|
||||
|
||||
We've been your MCM/tech partner for a while, so this is a straight offer:
|
||||
|
||||
Most sites we see on networks like yours are leaving 10–30% of RPM on the
|
||||
table to layout shift, slow LCP, consent handling, and ad placement decay.
|
||||
Rebuilding one is usually a few hours of work for us — so here's the deal:
|
||||
|
||||
- We rebuild your network's sites for **free**. Faster pages, stable layout,
|
||||
consent-compliant, ad slots repositioned for viewability.
|
||||
- **You keep the upside.** We measure RPM per site in GAM for 30 days before
|
||||
and 30 days after — the numbers decide whether it worked.
|
||||
- If it doesn't lift RPM, we revert and you've lost nothing.
|
||||
- If it works, your publishers earn more, churn drops, and our standard MCM
|
||||
share covers our cost. Everybody's incentive is the same direction.
|
||||
|
||||
We can start with your 3–5 worst-performing sites this week as a pilot.
|
||||
You pick them (or we will, from the RPM report), we deliver in 48 hours each.
|
||||
|
||||
— [NAME], [COMPANY]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Internal notes (not for the pitch)
|
||||
|
||||
- Why owners say yes: costs them nothing, no publisher Armageddon risk
|
||||
(revert path exists), and they're margin-focused by nature.
|
||||
- Measurement is already in hand: MA means we see their GAM. Before/after
|
||||
RPM per site is the whole proof.
|
||||
- Secondary offer to the same people: **turnkey sites** — "need more
|
||||
containers? We produce ad-onboarded sites with content for $X each."
|
||||
These buyers buy assets, not tools. Price per volume.
|
||||
- Our cost per rebuild is hours of agent time + hosting we already run.
|
||||
- Don't promise specific % uplifts in writing; promise the measurement.
|
||||
37
sales/service-menu.md
Normal file
37
sales/service-menu.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|||
# Service menu — draft for [YOUR COMPANY NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
> One-time technical services, delivered by our automation stack, QA'd by our
|
||||
> engineers. Fixed prices, fast turnaround. Edit freely — this is a draft for
|
||||
> your voice/branding.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Ad-ready publisher site — 48 hours — $750–1,500
|
||||
A complete, fast, policy-clean publisher site: 8–20 original articles
|
||||
(paginated for session depth), consent/privacy pages, hosting on our
|
||||
infrastructure, Cloudflare DNS + TLS, and your ad tags wired in.
|
||||
You own the domain and the inventory. Includes 30 days of hosting.
|
||||
|
||||
Upsell: content expansion (+$25/article/mo), additional niches, analytics setup.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Ad setup / revenue-leak audit — $500
|
||||
We audit a publisher's ad setup end to end: tag placement, viewability,
|
||||
lazy-loading, consent handling, layout stability (CLS), fill-rate basics.
|
||||
Deliverable: a prioritized report of leaks with fixes — or we fix them
|
||||
(see #4).
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Core Web Vitals overhaul — $750
|
||||
LCP/CLS/INP measured before and after (Lab + field numbers included).
|
||||
Typical wins: image pipeline, font loading, render-blocking cleanup,
|
||||
cache headers. Deliverable: before/after report + deployed fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Fix-it engagement — from $500
|
||||
Anything in our wheelhouse, quoted fixed-price after a 30-minute call:
|
||||
site migrations, DNS/CDN cleanup, monitoring/alerting, uptime postmortems.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Notes for internal use:
|
||||
- Delivery cost to us is near zero (automation + QA pass). Margin ~95%.
|
||||
- Turnaround promise: #1 is the only 48h item; others are 2–3 business days.
|
||||
- Order of pitches: warm publisher clients first (they know our ad ops work),
|
||||
then any publisher community we're active in.
|
||||
- Collection: invoice through the existing company (rails already exist).
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue