drop redundant network-owner pitch (existing business model already covers that channel)

sales/network-owner-pitch.md

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-# Network owner pitch — draft for [YOUR COMPANY NAME]
-
-> Audience: the network owners you already interface with on the MA side.
-> One owner = many publisher sites. No per-publisher selling needed.
-
----
-
-**Subject: Free rebuilds for your network's sites — you keep the uplift**
-
-We've been your MCM/tech partner for a while, so this is a straight offer:
-
-Most sites we see on networks like yours are leaving 10–30% of RPM on the
-table to layout shift, slow LCP, consent handling, and ad placement decay.
-Rebuilding one is usually a few hours of work for us — so here's the deal:
-
-- We rebuild your network's sites for **free**. Faster pages, stable layout,
-  consent-compliant, ad slots repositioned for viewability.
-- **You keep the upside.** We measure RPM per site in GAM for 30 days before
-  and 30 days after — the numbers decide whether it worked.
-- If it doesn't lift RPM, we revert and you've lost nothing.
-- If it works, your publishers earn more, churn drops, and our standard MCM
-  share covers our cost. Everybody's incentive is the same direction.
-
-We can start with your 3–5 worst-performing sites this week as a pilot.
-You pick them (or we will, from the RPM report), we deliver in 48 hours each.
-
-— [NAME], [COMPANY]
-
----
-
-## Internal notes (not for the pitch)
-
-- Why owners say yes: costs them nothing, no publisher Armageddon risk
-  (revert path exists), and they're margin-focused by nature.
-- Measurement is already in hand: MA means we see their GAM. Before/after
-  RPM per site is the whole proof.
-- Secondary offer to the same people: **turnkey sites** — "need more
-  containers? We produce ad-onboarded sites with content for $X each."
-  These buyers buy assets, not tools. Price per volume.
-- Our cost per rebuild is hours of agent time + hosting we already run.
-- Don't promise specific % uplifts in writing; promise the measurement.